A few months ago, when “Gangnam Style” fever had kids ponying around the country, two baffled Fox News pinheads personalities debated the song’s appeal.
“I think what this fella Psy is tapping into…is the fact that people don’t want any meaning right now. The most popular music apparently is that without intelligible words…not reality, not feeling, not meaning.”
“So it means nothing…”
They never once considered that the song was in Korean and the gibberish they were hearing was indeed actual words in a different language, satirizing the wealthy Gangnam district of South Korea, an area obsessed with western culture.
From that mind-numbing discussion, they somehow segued into their perceived lack of meaning in children’s books.
Wait? What was that? No meaning in children’s books?! Oh yeah, the ignoramus commentator had a picture book rejected and was obviously still reeling from the sting.
“I had a little kids’ book I wrote; I sent it out to a few publishers. They bemoaned the fact…they said, gee, it seems like it has a message. I said, ‘Well, yeah, it’s about empowerment’. Well, books about messages right now aren’t selling.”
He then ridiculed WIMPY KID and OLIVIA, two of the best-selling children’s book series. (Probably because he didn’t think of them first.)
“Try to tell them about ‘courage’, that’s not going to be purchased by the great masses who now want not to be tapped on the heartstrings, if you will, but simply to be pushed toward ‘a good beat’.”
Darn straight, readers want a good beat. What they don’t want is to be beat over the head with a lesson you think they need to learn, sly Mr. Fox.
Message-driven picture books begin with the intention of teaching a life lesson, like how to have good manners. With the writer’s purpose being so righteous, the story can come across as preachy and self-important. Why don’t these books sell? Because they lack the one thing that kids really want: FUN. Think about it—children are being taught all day long—at home, at school, at places of worship. When they pick up a book, do you think they want to hear “remember to say please and thank you” yet again? If I were a kid, I’d shelve that book pronto. Kids want to be entertained.
Message-driven books are not subtle. They often contain the very phrase the writer intends to teach, like: “Just be nice and you’ll always have lots of friends!” This is the classic mistake of “telling” instead of “showing” with your words. It’s talking down to kids, it’s assuming they’re not intelligent creatures with limitless imaginations.
Not all books with messages are message-driven. In fact, the best books do contain messages, but they are subtly woven through a wondrous story rich in character, setting and action. Every good story contains a universal emotional truth—friendship, family, fitting in—that is slowly revealed through the main character’s journey. The character at the beginning of the book is not the same person by the end; they have been transformed. How have they changed? Within the answer lies the lesson. Character is paramount when writing, not the message. Begin with character. With character as the driving force, a message unfolds naturally and reveals itself organically; alternatively, when the writer begins with a message, they often push the character to act in order to deliver the lesson, rendering the story false.
I’m going to leap upon my soapbox now. I believe children’s books should be fun-driven. If books are going to compete with TVs, iProducts and video games, authors need to deliver an escape, a fantastical world where anything can and does happen. I write with fun in the forefront. I think back to my childhood and the things that I loved—like secret hideouts adults didn’t know existed. I was fascinated by Dahl’s chocolate factory and the fact that he chose a kid to run it. (I hope I didn’t spoil that for anyone. It has been almost 50 years since the book was released.) A kid in charge! Marvelous! And yet, Dahl still had a message, but it was hand-dipped in chocolate.
So let’s circle back—does DIARY OF A WIMPY KID have a message? It sure does. I can name a bunch: being yourself, persevering through difficult situations, being able to laugh at yourself. These are all important life lessons.
Of course, no one would call Jeff Kinney’s series “message-driven”, yet a lot of people mistake these kind of FUN books as being worthless teachers, as being meaningless. I beg to differ. (And I beg Fox News to get a clue.)
It’s time to do the exact opposite of writing message-driven books: assume kids are already smart as whips. (Believe me, they are.) A message-driven book isn’t going to teach them anything except to avoid reading. And that’s a lesson no one needs to learn!
59 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 29, 2013 at 1:01 pm
Kim MacPhersonKim
Bravo, Tara! Great post! That’s a huge reason why I write children’s books– to help develop a true love, a PASSION, for reading!! Thanks for this!
April 29, 2013 at 1:03 pm
Kim MacPherson
Bravo, Tara! Great post! A huge reason why I write children’s books is because I want to develop that love– that PASSION– for reading. Thanks for this!
April 29, 2013 at 1:03 pm
Donna Black
Rock on, Tara. I totally agree.
April 29, 2013 at 1:04 pm
Julie Falatko
I agree wholeheartedly. And I’m so glad you do what you do! Messagey books make me angry (there you go, messagey people, write a book that has the lines “Books are our friends. They shouldn’t make us angry.”) Bring on the FUN!
April 29, 2013 at 1:06 pm
Carter Higgins
Preach, sister. Love this.
April 29, 2013 at 1:08 pm
Lori Alexander
Agreed 100%
April 29, 2013 at 1:11 pm
Salina
Excellent post, Tara!
April 29, 2013 at 1:12 pm
littledbl
Standing ovation! Well said!
April 29, 2013 at 1:14 pm
Lane
Well said. I think it is HILARIOUS that the Fox New commentators completely missed (and dismissed) the sarcasm and irony in the lyrics of Gangnam Style. It is so relevant that they negated a foreign language as lacking meaning simply because it isn’t English, particularly because the song questions the very consumerist mentality that supports Murdoch’s empire (Newscorp, Fox News, tabloids). I find it embarrassing that we call people so ill informed purveyors of news.
April 29, 2013 at 1:17 pm
Kelly Ramsdell Fineman
We in the choir love this here sermon, Tara! Preach it!
April 29, 2013 at 1:22 pm
Deb Lund
Woo-hoo and Amen! Keep it up, darling! This is one to mark, to have handy when I don’t have the energy to respond to uninformed dribble. Thank you, thank you…
April 29, 2013 at 1:24 pm
Jo Swartz
I have to disagree. I think the message that authors are getting is the story can’t have a message at all.
I have pretty strong messages and even the punchline states the message outright at the end – but they have a twist, are fun, and kids love them. I have received spontaneous applause. I had one little girl want ‘to marry me!’
Kids are grateful for the messages that they hear too little of. It is the message that their soul sings – but isn’t much reinforced in the world. It is about justice, right and wrong, fairness, compassion. The Berenstein Bears are about the preachiest books ever – and they were wildly successful. A friend just mentioned to me Thomas the Tank Engine – super messagy – but very popular. It is these books that truly speak to the child’s sense of who they WANT to be and how they want the world they live in to be.
If a positive message delivered to your children makes you angry – then there is something wrong – but not with the message. Granted, there are message books badly written -but that goes for all books of all kinds.
I think the message ought to be – books CAN have a message, they can and ought to teach us something, they ought to be elevating – they must also be fun, appealing, and thought-provoking. I don’t think the role of the artist is merely to entertain. I think it is to make us better people. And I think there is room for the merely entertaining – but NOT at the exclusion of the elevating.
April 29, 2013 at 2:42 pm
Tara Lazar
And that’s precisely the message I don’t want authors to get–that a story cannot have a message. They should and do. The difference lies in how you deliver that message–if it is the driving force rather than letting the character’s journey be the driving force. If the message comes from the character’s decisions and actions, then it is organic to the story. If the author makes the character act in order to push the message, then it feels forced.
April 29, 2013 at 1:32 pm
Carol Munro
Fox News? Oh, don’t even go there. No, really, don’t go there.
I’m glad I missed that broadcast. I would have been leaping outta my seat, yelling at the T.V.
I love your focus on FUN. And I think I needed to be reminded to remember what I loved when I was a kid (digging holes so deep and so wide, five of us could jump into it, with one kid still at surface level to pull us all out).
April 29, 2013 at 1:38 pm
Sue Heavenrich
Brava! (standing ovation). I love your message-driven post…. but I fear the faux commentators have stuffing in their ears.
April 29, 2013 at 1:41 pm
Katia Raina
I think what these (ahem Fox news) commentators have missed is that good books are about truth, not message. What makes the writer think he or she is so smart, and suddenly knows it all, when she just starts a story? Just be nice and you’ll have lots of friends. Is this advice the truth? Sometimes. Sometimes not at all. I say, don’t set out to teach a lesson, set out to discover! And lo and behold, the kids will discover something worthwhile, along with you.
🙂
Katia
April 29, 2013 at 2:46 pm
Tara Lazar
Wise thoughts, Katia!
April 11, 2016 at 9:17 am
Seera
GREAT point!! Thank you!
April 29, 2013 at 1:58 pm
Michelle Heidenrich Barnes
Amen girl. That’s all I have to say.
April 29, 2013 at 2:07 pm
KidLitReviews
Great! I think this should be sent to Fox and those idiots. (Sorry, I won’t change that to something nicer – can’t think of any). I love your defense of messages in kids books coming from within the story not jammed down a kid’s throat.
The one that wrote a kids book and got rejected (how many publishers did he send to, two, three, four? Gee, I know an author that sent to 27 before being accepted for her first book.), if he had that same attitude in his letter to these publishers, he lucky he got a message in return — did he actually get a message from each of these publishers or is he assuming this was the problem and not maybe his writing ?
Tara you did good and I stand by you. Bravo!
April 29, 2013 at 5:36 pm
Tara Lazar
The person that was speaking is a so-called “celebrity”, albeit a Fox News celebrity…which isn’t really a celebrity, I suppose. He didn’t state how far and wide he submitted the story, but I can guess it was to big houses through an agent of some sort, as he has published other adult books.
April 29, 2013 at 2:10 pm
Catherine Johnson
Go Tara!
April 29, 2013 at 2:21 pm
KJ Bateman
Well said, Tara.
I think all books have a message or theme. The difference is in how they are written. If the author has a specific message she bends the plot and characters to that message at the expense of believable development. This pushes the reader out of the story and prevents discovery of the theme. The reader may have a different interpretation of what the theme is.
This doesn’t apply only to children’s books; adult books can have the same problem.
April 29, 2013 at 2:26 pm
Laura Lowman Murray
Love the post!
April 29, 2013 at 2:37 pm
Holly Ruppel
My sentiments exactly! I happily missed that particular FOX segment. Bravo, Tara!
April 29, 2013 at 2:47 pm
Tara Dairman
Love this post, Tara!
April 29, 2013 at 2:53 pm
Diane Kress Hower
I love anyone who can out smart a FOX. Well done, Tara!
April 29, 2013 at 3:17 pm
C. C. Gevry
Great post, Tara. Originally, I was set to disagree with you, but I’m glad I stuck with your post until the end. I once read a book about Christmas where the author’s message of recycling called for the elves to re-gift in order to save mountains, streams, and wildlife, and it claimed the Wise Men carried their gifts of frankincense and myrrh because they were earth friendly. It seemed an abuse of traditional Christmas symbols for the sake of a message.
Following along a character’s journey and learning something is wonderful. Being dealt a message with a hammer over your head is not.
Thanks for the post.
April 29, 2013 at 5:38 pm
Tara Lazar
LOL, I’m glad you stuck it out, too!
April 29, 2013 at 3:18 pm
Melanie Ellsworth
My favorite line in this post – so true and important to remember: “assume kids are already smart as whips.”
April 29, 2013 at 5:40 pm
Tara Lazar
Melanie, I’ll tell you a very personal story. When my parents divorced, my mother gave me a story that reassured me it wasn’t my fault. Oh my goodness, I never in a million years thought it was my fault. I was smart enough to realize that. They didn’t understand why I was so sad and upset–and it was simply because the two people I loved most would no longer be together. NOT MY FAULT!
April 30, 2013 at 8:54 am
melaniebellsworth3
I’m glad you shared this – I actually just finished writing a PB on divorce and tried very hard to not make it message-driven but just honest and reassuring for kids. I read through it again last week trying to take out any heavy-handedness that might have crept in.
April 29, 2013 at 3:18 pm
heylookawriterfellow
Testify!
But I find it shocking that a commentator at Fox News would say something that was incorrect and/or misleading.
April 29, 2013 at 5:40 pm
Tara Lazar
*snort*
April 29, 2013 at 3:26 pm
gabrielleshamsey
Interesting post. When a children’s story seems ham fisted it will be irritating to any age group. I feel like many of today’s childrens books are going too far in the other direction (no beginning, middle and conclusion). My kids love Curious George (full of messages), Shel Silverstein and Dr. Seuss (brilliant, philosophical messages delivered with *GASP* RHYME!). Any book that is done poorly is aggrivating, messgage book or not. I agree with KJ Bateman that all books (adult and children) have a message or theme. The job of the author/illustrator is to keep it fresh and above all, clever. Unfortunately, any children’s book these days labled a “message book” is doomed. That’s ashame because there are many amazing teachers (artists and illustrators) with beautiful messages to send. Keep up the great work Tara. I enjoyed thinking about this topic.
April 29, 2013 at 5:03 pm
Andrea
Thanks for this thought-provoking post! It’s funny, as kindergarten teacher I find that most books DO have a message or theme, if you look for it. That’s one of the reasons why we love them, because they contain those universal truths that bring out emotions. But I’m with you that books have to be fun!
April 29, 2013 at 5:08 pm
Tara Lazar
Yes, Andrea, most books do have a message. And they should. What I’m trying to advise against is starting to write with the intention of delivering a message. When you begin with a character instead, their emotional journey will typically reveal a message, and thus it does so naturally, not by beating the reader over the head.
April 29, 2013 at 7:41 pm
Boo Stad
Halleluiah! Finally! Someone ‘gets it’ and is not afraid to say it!
Thanks Tara for banishing my angst. Fun, fun, fun is always number one, (whoops a stray rhyme, sorry purists.)
Just reading some of the comments above leads me to believe that some people may be ‘over-thinking’ their writing process. I’m not advocating abandoning correct procedure, but for goodness sake, what is so wrong with allowing a cool name, a random title, (The Giant Cornflakes On My Roof Are Fixing My Flying Saucer) or simply a ridiculous, impossible situation to stew in your head for a while and then, simply sitting down too allow the artiste within to create FUN! No hidden agenda just let it run free and true.
When interacting with young kids, in whatever medium, it helps to have a broad sense of the ridiculous.
I have found, as I’m sure other ‘Taradiddles’ have, that on completion of said ridiculous offering, by the third re-write you spot more subtle messages than you can poke a ‘Pooh-Stick’ at. You’ll also discover those ‘Smart Whips’ will find a whole lot more.
C’mon, that’s gotta’ be fun?
April 29, 2013 at 9:29 pm
K.L. Pickett
Boy, was your writing right-on!
April 29, 2013 at 10:04 pm
Donna L Martin
I LOVE this post, Tara…so true! May I always write the fun stories…and weave a little whisper of a lesson in the fabric of my characters along the way…;~)
Donna L Martin
April 30, 2013 at 12:04 am
DaydreamsinWonderland
What a wonderful post! Love the part you touched on about talking down to kids as if they’re not intelligent, imaginative individuals.
April 30, 2013 at 2:30 am
tinamcho
Psy + picture books = a very creative post, Tara! You got the message across!
April 30, 2013 at 3:41 am
julietclarebell
Very very true, and well put. I really like your ‘assume kids are already as smart as whips’. Thanks for the post. Sadly, I don’t think you’re going to get very far persuading Fox to think differently…!
April 30, 2013 at 7:49 am
gabrielleshamsey
I am mulling over this (still!). I understand the concept of allowing a character drive the story without some preachy, obvious message slathered on top. Most kids know condescention even if they don’t know what that word means. The divorce book is a perfect example of the worst kind of children’s book. It sounds like it was presumptious and patronizing. I simply think some of the books out today (that claim to be nothing but fun) are written from a lazy place. Of course (many although NOT all) kids are wonderfuly silly and they are magnificent. A place always exists for the ridiculous but I would argue that many books for kids today have not been over-thought, quite the contrary, they seem to have no thought put into them at all. Too many ridiculous books can get on a kids nerves after a while.
In my humble opinion, I believe it’s stilting to insist that children’s books should be approached as charachter driven. When rules are implemented on any creative process, the art will suffer. True, chararcter driven children’s stories tend to present themselves more organically but not all of them. So many artists/writers have a message to convery. Many concept books are in fact, “meassage books.” I am just leery of this industry wide backlash against message books and (as you so wonderfully detailed in an earlier post) against rhyme. I say to artists and writers, just go for it. Create a story that make your heart sing. Don’t over think it. If it comes from a message or a charachter or a quark in an atom just write it! Just paint it! Then share it. The kids will tell you the truth, always.
April 30, 2013 at 10:01 am
Tara Lazar
I think you touch on an important point, and that is a writer truly has to write from their heart, where their passion lies. This is the only way the story will succeed. Trying to be something you aren’t as a writer is a recipe for disaster. (I should know, I have tried it. And failed.)
May 1, 2013 at 6:19 am
Boo Stad
Amen.
April 30, 2013 at 12:04 pm
Michelle Levin
Such a great and valuable post. Great books (for ALL ages) do have messages, enduring themes, and widely relatable characters. They have messages but much of why they are great is that these stories are SO much MORE than their message. Sure, if you pull them apart in a class or in a particularly reflective moment then you can unearth their explicit messages. For example, Dahl is saying quite a few things about the best way for children to behave… Augustus Gloop? Have you learned your lesson. But the messages seep through to children without them having to do that analysis and certainly without it being spelled out.
Great books are great, in part, because their story is LOVED (the lesson comes subtly later).
April 30, 2013 at 8:37 pm
laurimeyers
Wait, isn’t The Monstore message driven about stopping the illegal importation and trade of nighttime creatures? I thought it was going to finally address the black market for monsters which is raging havoc on today’s youth. (This was all I could come with it since I can’t even say the F-O-X word out loud without ranting. *cringing*)
May 1, 2013 at 1:07 am
Romelle Broas
Amen! Well said, Tara. Fun-driven…love it!
May 1, 2013 at 12:15 pm
julie rowan zoch
There is nothing my kid disliked more about PBs than getting ‘socked’! You go, girl!
May 1, 2013 at 4:17 pm
biculturalmama
I agree – for the most part most of the best children’s books do have messages, just subtle instead of in your face. As for Psy, yeah, Fox totally missed that the words were real but just in a different language. But I suppose they probably don’t know any other languages so it never crossed their minds which is pretty ignorant.
May 1, 2013 at 5:04 pm
lunamaria413
Great post, Tara! This is something I’ve struggled with, and hopefully one day will conquer! Thanks for sharing your wisdom 🙂
May 2, 2013 at 10:46 am
wendymyersart
Great post, Tara. You are so absolutely right. Fox, they amaze me all the time-and never in a good way.
May 4, 2013 at 3:03 pm
Laura
Thanks for a great post. Also totally agree with Gabrielleshamsey. Same principle goes for Tv shows. Barney is unbearable, it is so preachy. Sponge bob, on the other hand…fun!
June 8, 2013 at 8:40 pm
viviankirkfield
Hello Tara! Yes, I know…you wrote this post like two months ago and I am only just commenting now. Perhaps you wondered, ‘Where is Vivian…why isn’t she commenting on this post?’ Or probably not. 🙂
You’ve made some really great points, Tara…I love what you say about creating a book that is fun! You are so right…kids are in school every day (hopefully) learning (again, hopefully) and want to kick back and relax when they have time off…and if we want them to be reading in their ‘off-time’…we need to provide kick-back literature. Of course it can teach them something…and most probably there will be, as you note, many messages. We have to just try not to hit them over the head with them (the messages, not the books…oh, please don’t hit them over the head with the books either…that was what some teachers used to do back in NYC schools in the early 50’s…perhaps that explains the interesting behavior of college students in the late 60’s). 🙂 Great post, Tara…I’m sharing. 🙂
August 14, 2013 at 2:10 am
More Interesting Links About Children’s Literature | Lynley Stace
[…] What’s Wrong With Writing Message-Driven Picture Books? from Tara Lazar […]
December 31, 2013 at 11:14 am
JEN Garrett
Just found your blog through SCBWI.
One of my current favorite PB’s is “The Dot” by Peter H. Reynolds. An unassuming, character-driven book, with a big message tucked in the story. My five little readers loved it, too. Watch the kids and they will tell you what they like.
April 11, 2016 at 9:12 am
Seera
I just can’t agree more!! This is what I have been trying to tell everyone since I started studying media.. You just said it very beautifully.. I love the way you write.. Thank you.. Visual stories have the same issue of beating over our heads with messages, especially religious ones!
February 27, 2018 at 5:51 am
The World Is My Cuttlefish
The exact piece of advice I needed to hear (again!) right now. Thank you, Tara.