A new critique group member recently presented us with Chapter I of her YA novel—an engaging high school sports saga with a female athlete protagonist. After hearing our comments, she confessed that it wasn’t the first time she’d shared this piece. Workshop members from a local college had very different reactions than the ones we provided. For instance, they did not appreciate her clever metaphors, whereas I felt the work was strongest at those points—humorous, insightful, spoken with a strong and unique character voice.
At home that evening with a cup of tea and time to reflect, I wondered: is there such a thing as too many critiques? After all, not everyone agrees on the merits of published books, so a first draft would certainly elicit a wide range of comments. If a writer is presented with a dozen different viewpoints on the same story, which suggestions should she accept and which should she let slide?
Firstly, writers need to examine how many people point out the same problems. If there is more than one critique member who questions the character’s motive in a particular scene, then it makes sense to consider that section more carefully. But points on which the critique group does not agree, it’s appropriate for the writer to trust her own instincts, either by revising or letting the words remain.
Next, getting to know your critique partners well helps to reveal the most reliable criticisms. There are people whose judgment you will tend to trust, and those who just don’t agree with your direction. There will be those who always insist on line-editing until your prose reads exactly like their own. A group member may have a wildly differing style or not call your genre a specialty. It is important to listen to all criticisms and to understand why they are being voiced, but to address every single one is not productive. Too many cooks may indeed spoil the broth.
There’s no doubt that every manuscript needs to be critiqued. If you’ve completed a first draft and you’re licking the envelope to that agent: stop. You’ve only just begun. Find a critique group and get ready to rewrite.
There are no rules regarding how many times something can be workshopped, but as you become more familiar with the revision process, you’ll soon learn which advice to listen to and which you can ignore. A novel will not be all things to all readers, but it needs to be true to your vision as a writer.
What do you think? Can work be over-critiqued?
















5 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 10, 2008 at 2:31 am
Robin Mizell
Tara:
Anne Mini is discussing this subject in a series of posts over at Author! Author! With regard to one of her points, I agree that agents and editors consider receptivity to criticism a highly desirable quality in an author. It might be ranked third behind originality and platform and just ahead of general knowledge of the publishing industry.
Robin, many thanks for pointing me to Anne’s blog. I skimmed through her excellent article and have bookmarked the site for reference.
I should probably note that my post above refers to peer critiques. I believe that if a publisher, editor or agent stops to give a piece of advice, an aspiring author should listen carefully, thank them for their time, and start revising.
The critique group member referred to in this piece said she was thankful to find our group since we don’t hold anything back. Her college group was like walking on eggshells, she said—people were afraid to both give criticism and receive it. We have far tougher skins to match our thorough manuscript reviews. We are partners in each other’s success; we want our friends’ manuscripts to be the best they can be before being submitted.
April 28, 2008 at 5:59 pm
Shari
Great post – thanks! Glad to have discovered your blog. 🙂
July 6, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Kara
I think I’ll be able to answer this question next week! I’m having a picture book critiqued by a formal group on Monday, a colleague on Tuesday and a fellow SCBWI member next week. The hardest part is figuring out who to listen to!
July 7, 2008 at 5:43 pm
dramaquill
This was an excellent post. I thoroughly enjoyed checked out your blogsite as well.
I belong to a crit group (online) and the 6 of us have been together for about 4 years now. Sometimes, nearly everyone targets a specific issue in the manuscript – definitely cause to check that out again. Other times, the opinions are varied and quite random. It’s true that you don’t just change everything simply because someone made a comment.
Thanks to our group and the consistency of staying together, most of us have at least sold articles or essays or children’s poems/stories. All of us are working on novels in either MG, YA or adult genres. One of our members has her first MG coming out in 2009 with a recognized publisher.
You hit all the points right on. Excellent
October 19, 2016 at 1:22 am
Shanti
It’s true. Too much criticism does kill something…